My Top 10 Reasons for Leaving Philadelphia: #9 - We Don't Really Want to Reform Education
I often wonder why everyone thinks it's really rocket science to figure out what great education should look like for low income urban children in the United States. Do people really think it would look different than the best quality education afforded to rich folks? When I look at the best resourced schools - like the one I'm actually heading to - here's what I see:
a) Teachers with a minimum of 5 years of experience who are treated like professionals, provided tremendous amounts of professional development and time to work with colleagues doing teacher inquiry with regularity.
b) A curriculum rich with arts, music, dance, critical literacy, inquiry based learning. A curriculum constructed by teachers who work collaboratively, study recent research, and consider what's best for their particular students.
c) A class size of no more than 20 students.
d) A modern facility - clean, roomy, full of light. Additional space including a large gym, a swimming pool, a wonderful green field, a library with up to date books, periodicals, ebooks, journals and librarians.
e) A full complement of physical and behavioral health support professionals including several full time nurse practitioners, full time school counselors and psychologists - all with the same support for ongoing professional development and growth.
f) Healthy, organic, affordable food options for breakfast, lunch and snacks.
g) Support staff including secretaries, technology folks, teaching assistants, etc.
Well, you get the idea. Who wouldn't want this for their children? It would seem that in one of the richest countries in the world, this shouldn't be too hard to expect for our children. OK, I will give back the swimming pool - you don't really need one, as long as children have access to one in their community recreation centers...What - we don't have functional rec centers either?
So what do we get instead of the list above? We get a constant mantra of "we have to stop throwing money at urban education." We also get "The problem is the teachers. The problem is the curriculum. The problem is not taking enough tests." And so on. All the solutions being proposed by policy wonks who wouldn't put their own children in the urban schools they claim to be saving. People who believe that we can start a program where we take some really bright, well educated, priviliged students and throw them in to classrooms for 2 years and they will provide the education our chidlren need. Shoot, if that's the answer, why aren't all the schools with tons of money just snatching up those young kids right away? I mean, they must be master teachers because we believe they will save the neediest of our chidlren.
Ok, so I'm just tired. And I'm angry. I don't like always feeling angry. I'm sick and tired of watching "education policy people" claim all manner of education reform agendas - none of which address the fact that a good education costs money. And for the children in our urban areas, it means investment in more than just schools. It's investment in health care, in employment, in community centers, in the arts. Because it really does take a village to raise a child. And if we cared about a functioning democracy, and if we gave a damn about "other people's children" we would make that investment as a nation.
But it's a whole lot cheaper to just blame teachers and say that money doesn't matter. So shoot, I'll go somewhere where money really doesn't matter because the school I'm heading for has resources I never even dreamed were possible in the past 31 years of my teaching career. Maybe I should tell my new school that they could save a whole lot of money if they just got rid of their veteran teachers, stuff 33 kids in each class, got rid of all that health and technology support because it really doesn't matter, and tested the kids all day. Oh yeah, and ditched that dang swimming pool for crying out loud....